WHO‘S RESPONSIBLE ?

Dr Kat

A few days ago, a friend of mine (who's double jabbed) explained to me that he chose to take the C-19 'vaccine' after getting advice from a pharmacology professor whom he trusts implicitly. I chose not to engage further on the matter being a pro-choice activist- but that conversation has left me rather concerned. Many South Africans were coerced into taking the jabs, some took them out of fear and a large number followed advice from a trusted health professional. My concerns stem from the fact that the majority of South Africans (and people in general) do not understand what informed consent means nor do they understand (and exercise) their right to freedom of choice. I have much respect for my friend and know him to be a person to at least make some effort to get advice before making any (big) decisions - but did he get advice from the correct person and who's responsible now should (God forbid) there be repercussions to his decision to get jabbed? Governments the world over, including our South African government, have sung the same tune as Big Pharma, the CDC, and the WHO. It's easy to see why many people will have followed the pied pipers. Do they know that all of them have absolved themselves from impunity? You cannot sue the government or vaccine manufacturers should you experience any side effects from taking the jabs. mRNA technology is so new and it's still in the fledgling phase of development. Dr Robert Malone, the inventor of this tech, has risked (and tainted) his career by exposing the dangers of the mRNA 'vaccines' as research thus far indicates that these injections are not safe for humans. The risks far outweigh the benefits. Dr Sukharit Bakhdi has exposed the results of the pre-trial animal testing that showed 100% deaths in all the mice injected with these jabs. Pfizer and the CDC have changed their tune from initial advertising (and recommending) the jabs to prevent transmission and severe illness to now advocating regular boosters, of the same not-yet-proven-safe jabs. Just because mainstream media has not given the public the full picture does not mean that the information is not out there. When one looks deeper into the funding of media - by and large, they all lead to the same sources. There is absolutely no way that they are unbiased in their reporting. Was it the folly of the wise then, to make a decision that they thought was based on (what they considered) sound information? Or was it just another type of coercion wrapped in fear presented with a bow of media frenzy? After all, surely these same "wise" ones will not seek medical advice from an English professor. To me, it's the same as consulting a podiatrist for heartburn! Perhaps these individuals need to be reminded that not all health professionals are experts in all fields and no one, not even mRNA technology specialists themselves, can assure us of the long-term safety of these "vaccines". For the mere fact, that time is finite. We have to wait for "long term", collate "long term" data, and then decide about safety. As for efficacy, more and more boosters are being added on which says enough. Then there's the issue of "emergency use authorisation". Classical vaccinology taught us that we grant approval of experimental vaccines only for emergency use in cases of deadly diseases with no cure. It also teaches us that, once the epidemic/pandemic subsided, all experimental vaccines are withdrawn and sent back to laboratories for further research to satisfy standard requirements of approval. Due process must be followed. And yet, more efforts are being made and new campaigns are being formulated to get "jabs into arms" - now even for kids. At the end of the day, as I said in the last edition of Vuka News, "It is what it is". Pfizer syndrome/jab side effects are real. Who will take responsibility? More importantly - who IS responsible? Is it the person who sought advice from the incorrect source or is the ill-informed advisor? Lawsuits are popping up daily all over the world. More so in countries that have administered more jabs to the large percentage of their population. Make no mistake, we are seeing cases here too and before you know it, someone in South Africa will be sued for the same.

Die poppe sal dans !